For runners who crave bounce, comfort, and long-lasting durability, the ASICS Novablast 5 and Brooks Glycerin Max are two popular choices that bring top-level performance to every run.
The ASICS Novablast 5 has just launched with significant updates, including a new midsole foam that promises more energy and bounce, along with a super comfortable, breathable upper. But how does it compare to the well-loved Brooks Glycerin Max?
The Glycerin Max is loved for its plush cushioning and smooth ride, perfect for runners who want a softer feel with every step. It’s known for comfort on long distances and is packed with Brooks’ latest technology to reduce impact and enhance support.
In this comparison, we’ll dive into the key features of both shoes—from cushioning and responsiveness to durability and fit. By the end, you’ll have a clear idea of which shoe fits your needs best, whether you’re gearing up for a marathon, a daily jog, or an easy-paced run.
Let’s get started!
ASICS Novablast 5 VS Brooks Glycerin Max: Easy Comparison Table
| Specs | ASICS Novablast 5 | Brooks Glycerin Max |
|---|---|---|
| Midsole Technology | New FF BLAST Max | DNA Tuned |
| Midsole Drop | 8.0 mm | 6.0 mm |
| Heel Height | 41.5 mm | 45.0 mm |
| Forefoot Height | 33.5 mm | 39.0 mm |
| Support System | Neutral | Neutral |
| Weight (Men’s) | 8.9 oz / 252.3 g | 10.5 oz / 297.7 g |
| Weight (Women’s) | 7.9 oz / 225 g | 9.5 oz / 269.3 g |
| Waterproofing | No | $200 |
| Widths Available | Normal, Wide | NarrowNormal |
| Removable Insole | YES | YES |
| Price | $140 | $200 |
| Customer Rating | _ | 4.5 out of 5 |
Durability
Upper
The Brooks Glycerin Max and ASICS Novablast 5 both bring strong durability to the table, thanks to their carefully designed uppers.
The Glycerin Max has a highly breathable mesh upper that allows great airflow, which helps keep your feet cool during long runs. This upper design makes it durable in warm weather conditions, although it’s not waterproof.
On the other hand, the ASICS Novablast 5 uses a stretchy Jacquard mesh upper, which not only adds durability but also adapts to your foot for a secure, slipper-like fit. This material is also mostly recycled, making it an eco-friendlier option.
Midsole
The midsole in each of these shoes is designed to handle many miles. The ASICS Novablast 5 introduces the FF Blast Max midsole, which adds more bounce and energy to every step, providing a durable, high-energy feel.
Brooks uses their unique DNA Tuned foam in the Glycerin Max, which is nitrogen-infused with dual-cell technology.
This design strikes a balance between softness and responsiveness, using larger foam cells in the heel for a cushioned landing and smaller cells in the forefoot for a more springy toe-off.
This midsole design is built for durability, helping runners who land harder on their heels.
Outsole
Both shoes feature durable rubber outsoles designed for high mileage. The ASICS Novablast 5 has an AHAR® LO outsole rubber, which offers excellent traction and adds to the shoe’s overall durability.
Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin Max has a tough rubber outsole with strategically placed sections to ensure a strong grip on various surfaces. Although neither shoe is suited for heavy rain or wet trails, the rubber patterns help keep you stable on drier surfaces.
Comfort
Cushioning
Comfort is key in both shoes, but they provide it in slightly different ways. The ASICS Novablast 5’s FF Blast Max midsole brings a trampoline-like bounce that’s especially enjoyable for runners who like extra energy in each step.
The Brooks Glycerin Max, on the other hand, is focused on giving a soft, plush feel with its DNA Tuned foam. This foam works well to absorb impact, making it a great choice for longer runs where your feet might feel more fatigue.
Arch Support
Both models are designed for neutral runners, meaning they work best for people with normal-sized arches. The Glycerin Max has added support through dual-density foam, which helps keep the foot stable without feeling too rigid.
ASICS Novablast 5 also supports a neutral gait, providing even pressure from heel to toe with each step.
Fit & Sizing
The fit of each shoe also varies. The ASICS Novablast 5 has a snug but stretchy fit, thanks to its Jacquard mesh upper and tongue wing construction that prevents the tongue from shifting during runs.
The Glycerin Max is true to size and has a slightly snug feel, designed to give a secure fit without feeling too tight. Both shoes offer a comfortable fit, though trying each one on is the best way to find out what feels right for you.
Style & Design
Design and Looks
When it comes to design, both shoes bring a modern look that appeals to runners who like stylish gear. The Brooks Glycerin Max has a bold, eye-catching design, thanks to its large midsole and bright color options.
This makes it a fun choice for those who want a fashionable running shoe. ASICS Novablast 5, with its sleek and sporty look, has a slightly more subtle design but still offers reflective details that help with visibility in low light.
Performance Features
Performance-wise, both shoes shine in their own way. The Novablast 5’s trampoline-inspired outsole design gives it a strong bounce, ideal for runners who want a more energized feel.
The Glycerin Max’s GlideRoll rocker technology creates a smooth transition from heel to toe, making it great for a fluid, natural stride.
Waterproofing
Waterproofing
Neither the ASICS Novablast 5 nor the Brooks Glycerin Max is waterproof. While both shoes are suitable for dry weather and light rain, they lack the Gore-Tex membrane that would make them fully waterproof.
For runners who need a waterproof option, it might be worth considering another model.
Performance in Wet Conditions
Though these shoes aren’t designed for wet trails or heavy rain, they can handle light moisture and typical road conditions. The outsoles on both models are built to grip well on flat surfaces, but they may not hold up as securely on slippery or muddy terrain.
So, for most regular runs, these shoes will work well, but for rainy or unpredictable weather, a waterproof model might be a better fit.
Customer Review and Feedback
ASICS Novablast Reviews
Not Available
Brooks Glycerin Max Reviews
Positive Reviews:
- Exceptional Comfort: Customers highlighted the Glycerin Max as one of the most comfortable shoes they’ve ever worn, ideal for both running and walking.
- Innovative Cushioning: The new nitrogen-infused foam was praised for providing an excellent cushioning experience that feels soft yet responsive.
- Great for Long Runs: Many runners found that the shoe performed exceptionally well on long distances, providing support even when fatigue set in.
- Fun to Run In: Users enjoyed how lively the shoe felt, making it fun to run at various paces without feeling sluggish.
- Roomy Fit: Reviewers appreciated the roomy toe box and breathable mesh upper, which contributed to overall comfort during runs.
Negative Reviews:
- Heavy Feel: Some users commented on the shoe’s weight, noting that it felt bulkier than expected, which could be tiring over long distances.
- High Price Point: At around $200, some customers felt the price was steep compared to other options on the market.
- Mixed Performance Feedback: A few runners experienced issues with responsiveness during their runs, feeling that it didn’t live up to its “effortless” claims.
Brooks Glycerin 21 VS Glycerin Max: Which One is Right for You?
Durability
If you prefer a shoe that feels light and offers a bouncy ride, the ASICS Novablast 5 might be the better choice. It is ideal for runners looking for energy return and comfort over longer distances.
However, if you want a more cushioned feel with stability, especially if you run with a heavier foot strike, the Brooks Glycerin Max could be more suitable.
Ultimately, both shoes are durable and well-designed, so your choice should depend on your specific running style and preferences.
Comfort
If you prefer a shoe that gives you a bouncy and energetic feel, the ASICS Novablast 5 is likely the better choice. It’s great for those who enjoy a lively run and want that extra boost in each step.
On the other hand, if you are looking for maximum cushioning and comfort, especially for longer distances, the Brooks Glycerin Max would be more suitable. Its plush feel helps reduce fatigue during extended runs.
Style & Design
If you prefer a shoe that makes a bold fashion statement while offering great performance, the Brooks Glycerin Max is the way to go. Its vibrant colors and plush cushioning make it both stylish and comfortable.
If you like a more understated look with excellent bounce and energy return, the ASICS Novablast 5 is an excellent choice. Its sleek design and innovative features provide both style and functionality.
Waterproofing
If you need a shoe specifically for rainy weather or wet trails, you might want to look for a different model that offers waterproof features.
For regular runs in dry weather or light rain, both the ASICS Novablast 5 and Brooks Glycerin Max will work well.
However, if you’re looking for a shoe that provides extra protection against moisture, consider exploring other options that include waterproof technology.
What do runners talk about the durability of the Novablast 5 compared to the Glycerin Max?
ASICS Novablast 5:
Runners have noted that while the Novablast 5 feels great initially, its cushioning tends to degrade after around 280 miles (450 km)
After this point, many experience soreness in their knees and shins, indicating that the shoe might not hold up well for longer distances.
The outsole can also struggle with grip on wet surfaces, which can be a concern for those running in varied conditions.
Brooks Glycerin Max:
In contrast, the Glycerin Max is praised for its durability. Many runners report that it maintains its comfort and cushioning over many miles, making it suitable for longer runs and daily training.
However, some users have mentioned that more rubber coverage could be used on the outsole to improve its performance on different surfaces.
Overall, runners feel more confident in the Glycerin Max lasting through extensive use.
What do runners talk about the comfort of the Novablast 5 compared to the Glycerin Max?
ASICS Novablast 5:
The Novablast 5 is known for its bouncy and energetic feel, especially when running at faster paces.
However, some runners find it less comfortable during slower runs due to its instability, particularly for heel strikers.
The shoe requires good form to avoid discomfort, which may not suit everyone.
Brooks Glycerin Max:
Runners often describe the Glycerin Max as one of the most comfortable shoes they’ve ever worn. Its plush upper and generous cushioning provide a soft feel that is great for long distances.
Many users appreciate how it feels like “running on pillows,” making it ideal for recovery runs or long training sessions. The fit is generally true to size and accommodates wider feet well, adding to its overall comfort.
What do runners talk about regarding the style of Novablast 5 compared to Glycerin Max?
ASICS Novablast 5
The Novablast 5 features a sleek and modern design that appeals to many runners. Its lightweight construction and vibrant color options make it visually attractive. However, some users feel that the minimalistic upper could use a bit more structure for better support.
Brooks Glycerin Max
The Glycerin Max also boasts a stylish look with a plush upper that many find appealing. While it has a bulkier appearance due to its high stack height, runners appreciate the overall aesthetic and find it visually pleasing. The design combines functionality with style, making it suitable for both running and casual wear.
Are there any common issues runners face with the Brooks Glycerin Max that they don’t with the ASICS Novablast 5?
Runners have pointed out some common issues with the Brooks Glycerin Max that they typically do not experience with the ASICS Novablast 5. Here are the main differences:
Common Issues with Brooks Glycerin Max
Weight and Bulkiness
Many runners describe the Glycerin Max as feeling heavy and bulky. While it offers a lot of cushioning, some find that this extra weight can make it feel cumbersome, especially during longer runs.
This is in contrast to the Novablast 5, which is often praised for being lighter and more agile.
Fit and Lockdown Problems
Some users have reported issues with the fit of the Glycerin Max, particularly around the ankle.
The heel counter can feel low, leading to heel slippage during runs. This can be frustrating for runners who want a secure fit.
In comparison, the Novablast 5 generally provides a more snug fit without as many complaints about slippage.
Tongue Design
The tongue of the Glycerin Max has been criticized for not staying in place well, which can lead to discomfort during runs. Runners have mentioned needing to adjust their laces more often to keep their feet secure.
The Novablast 5, on the other hand, tends to have a more stable tongue design that stays put better.
Advantages of ASICS Novablast 5
Lightweight Feel
- Runners often find that the Novablast 5 feels lighter and less obtrusive on their feet. This makes it easier to maintain speed and comfort over longer distances.
Better Stability for Fast Paces
- Although some runners find stability issues with the Novablast 5, many agree that it feels more responsive at faster paces compared to the Glycerin Max. This can be beneficial for those looking to pick up their speed during training or races.
In summary, while both shoes have their strengths, common issues with the Brooks Glycerin Max include its weight, fit problems, and tongue design, which are generally less problematic in the ASICS Novablast 5.
Are there any common issues runners face with the ASICS Novablast 5 that they don’t with the Brooks Glycerin Max?
Common Issues with ASICS Novablast 5
Instability
Many runners find the Novablast 5 to be unstable, especially when running at faster paces or on uneven surfaces. This instability can lead to discomfort and even injuries if a runner is not careful about their form.
Heel strikers, in particular, may struggle because the shoe’s design does not support this style well.
Fit Problems
Some users report that the toe box of the Novablast 5 is too roomy, which can make it hard for their feet to grip the shoe properly. This can lead to slippage and less control during runs.
Additionally, runners with high arches may find that the shoe does not provide enough support.
Durability Concerns
After about 280 miles, many runners notice a decline in cushioning and responsiveness. This can lead to soreness in the knees and shins after runs, making it feel less comfortable over time compared to other options.
Advantages of Brooks Glycerin Max
Better Stability
Runners generally find the Glycerin Max to be more stable than the Novablast 5. This makes it a better choice for those who want a reliable shoe for various running conditions.
Comfort Over Time
The Glycerin Max tends to maintain its comfort even after longer distances. Many users report that it feels good throughout their runs and does not lose its cushioning as quickly as the Novablast 5.
Fewer Fit Issues
Although some runners mention minor fit problems with the Glycerin Max, such as a shallow upper or tongue slipping, these issues are often less severe than those experienced with the Novablast 5. The overall fit is generally more secure for a wider range of foot shapes.
In summary, while both shoes have their strengths, runners often face more significant challenges with stability and fit in the ASICS Novablast 5 compared to the Brooks Glycerin Max.
Want to dive deeper into each shoe? Check out our detailed reviews: