Asics Gel Kayano 30 VS GT 2000 12: Comparison Running Shoe

Today, I’m diving into a comparison of two popular models from ASICS: the Gel Kayano 30 and the GT 2000 12. Both shoes have their unique features and benefits, making them favorites among runners.

The ASICS Gel Kayano 30 is known for its plush cushioning and advanced stability, making it a great choice for long-distance runners or anyone who might need a little extra support.

On the other hand, the Asics GT 2000 12 is a lighter option that offers a more versatile ride, perfect for those who enjoy a mix of short runs and tempo workouts.

In this blog post, we’ll break down the key differences between these two shoes, helping you decide which one is right for your running style and needs.

Feature Comparison: Asics Gel Kayano 30 VS GT 2000 12

FeatureAsics Gel Kayano 30ASICS GT-2000 12
Midsole TechnologyGEL and FF BLAST Plus ECCOGEL and FF BLAST Plus
Midsole Drop10 mm8 mm
Heel Height40.0 mm34 mm
Forefoot Height30.0 mm28 mm
Support SystemNeutral, StabilityNeutral, Stability
Weight (Men’s)10.6 oz / 305 g9.5 oz / 270 g
Weight (Women’s)9.2 oz / 265 g8.3 oz / 235 g
WaterproofingNoNo
Widths AvailableNormal, Wide, X-WideNormal, Wide, X-Wide
Removable InsoleYESYES
Price$160$140
Customer Rating4.55 out of 54.6 out of 5

Durability

Durability: ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 VS GT-2000 12

When you’re picking best running shoes, durability is super important. You want shoes that can handle lots of miles without falling apart. Let’s look at the difference between the ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 and the GT-2000 12 to see how they hold up in different parts of the shoe.

Upper

The GEL-Kayano 30 features an engineered stretch knit upper that improves breathability and comfort. This means your feet can stay cool and feel good during long runs. Plus, at least 75% of the shoe’s main upper material is made from recycled materials, which is great for the environment!

The engineered stretch knit upper is designed for breathability, but some users found their feet getting warm during summer runs.

On the other hand, the GT-2000 12 has a jacquard mesh upper that also offers a supportive fit. About 50% of this shoe’s upper material is recycled too. Both shoes are designed to be durable, but the Kayano’s upper might feel a bit more breathable and flexible.

The jacquard mesh upper offers good ventilation, though some reviewers noted that the shoe can get warm quickly.

Midsole

Moving on to the midsole, the GEL-Kayano 30 has a revamped cushioning system with Flyte Foam BLAST™ PLUS ECO and PureGEL® technology cushioning. This new material is softer and has about 20% bio-based content, giving you a cloud-like feel with every step. It also features the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, which helps provide adaptive stability, making it great for longer distances.

The GT-2000 12 uses FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning and PureGEL® technology. This setup offers extra cushioning and helps with a smooth transition from heel to toe. While both shoes provide great cushioning, the Kayano 30 is designed for maximum comfort and stability, especially for longer runs.

Outsole

Now, let’s look at the outsole. The GEL-Kayano 30 has an AHAR®PLUS™ heel plug, which improves durability and helps the shoe last longer against wear and tear.

The GT-2000 12 also features AHAR® rubber, which is known for its durability and resistance to wear. Both outsoles are built to handle the road, but the Kayano 30 may have a slight edge in durability due to its advanced materials.

Weight Comparison

The GEL-Kayano 30 is a bit heavier, weighing 305 g/10.6 oz for men size 9, and 265 g/9.2 oz for women. The GT-2000 12 is lighter, coming in at 270 g/9.5 oz for men size 9, and 235 g/8.3 oz for women.

Comfort

Comfort: ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 VS GT-2000 12

Cushioning

Both shoes have great cushioning, but they do it in slightly different ways. The GEL-Kayano 30 features FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning, which is designed to feel super soft and comfortable. This shoe has a 4mm stack height increase, making it feel like you’re running on clouds! Plus, it has PureGEL® technology that is 65% softer than regular GEL, giving you a smooth ride with every step.

On the other hand, the GT-2000 12 uses FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning and PureGEL® technology as well. This combination provides extra cushioning that helps absorb shock when you run. Both shoes offer a great experience, but if you want maximum comfort, the Kayano 30 might be the better choice.

Arch Support

Now, let’s talk about arch support. Both shoes are designed for runners with neutral arches or who overpronate. The GEL-Kayano 30 has a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ that helps provide adaptive stability, making your stride feel more balanced and supported. This is especially helpful during long runs!

The GT-2000 12 also has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, which offers good support and stability. It helps create a smooth transition from heel to toe. Both shoes are great for keeping your arches happy, but the Kayano 30’s adaptive support might give it a slight edge.

Fit & Sizing

When it comes to fit and sizing, both shoes are designed to feel comfortable. The GEL-Kayano 30 has an engineered stretch knit upper, which improves breathability and gives a snug fit. This means your feet can stay cool and comfortable, even on long runs.

YOU CAN READ  Hey Dude VS Reef: Which Shoes Is Best?

The GT-2000 12 has a jacquard mesh upper, which also offers a supportive and comfortable fit. Both models fit true to size, so you can stick with your normal running shoe size. However, some runners might find the Kayano 30 to have a slightly more flexible and breathable feel.

Style and Design

Style and Design: ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 VS GT-2000 12

Overall Look

Both the GEL-Kayano 30 and GT-2000 12 have a modern, sporty vibe that many runners appreciate. The GEL-Kayano 30 features an engineered stretch knit upper that gives it a sleek, lightweight appearance. This design not only looks good but also helps keep your feet cool while you run. The reflective details are a nice touch for visibility during early morning or evening runs.

The GT-2000 12 has a jacquard mesh upper that also looks stylish while providing a supportive fit. It has a classic look that makes it a favorite among many runners. Both shoes come in a variety of colors, so you can choose one that matches your personal style!

Materials

The materials used in the shoes’ construction also contribute to their overall look and feel. The GEL-Kayano 30’s engineered stretch knit upper is made with at least 75% recycled materials, which is great for the environment. The sock liner is produced with a solution dyeing process that reduces water usage and carbon emissions compared to conventional dyeing.

The GT-2000 12 also uses recycled materials, with at least 50% of the main upper material made from recycled content. The sock liner is produced using a similar solution dyeing process as the Kayano 30. Both shoes prioritize sustainability in their design, which is a nice bonus for eco-conscious runners.

Vegan-Friendly

Another style consideration for some runners is whether the shoes are vegan-friendly. The GEL-Kayano 30 is designed to be vegan, with no materials of animal origin used in the construction. This includes the yarns, glues, and other adhesives. While it’s not certified by an independent third party, it’s a great option for those looking for vegan running shoes.

The GT-2000 12 also has a vegan-friendly design, with no animal-derived materials used. This makes both shoes suitable choices for runners who prefer vegan products.

Waterproofing & Non-Slip Grip

Waterproofing & Non-Slip Grip: ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 VS GT-2000 12

Waterproofing

The GEL-Kayano 30 is not specifically designed to be waterproof, but it does have features that help it perform well in light rain. The engineered stretch knit upper offers good breathability while keeping your feet comfortable. However, if you’re running in heavy rain or puddles, your feet might get wet since there’s no waterproof membrane.

Similarly, the GT-2000 12 also lacks a waterproof feature. It has a jacquard mesh upper that provides breathability and comfort, but like the Kayano, it won’t keep your feet dry in wet conditions. If you often run in the rain, you might want to consider wearing water-resistant socks or look for shoes specifically made for wet weather.

Non-Slip Grip

Now, let’s talk about grip. The GEL-Kayano 30 has a well-designed outsole with segmented rubber placements that provide good traction on the road. The increased heel bevel helps improve grip, especially when running on wet surfaces. Many runners have reported feeling confident while running in the rain due to the shoe’s reliable grip.

The GT-2000 12 also features an AHAR® rubber outsole designed for durability and traction. It provides a solid grip on various surfaces, including wet roads. The rearfoot PureGEL® technology helps with shock absorption, which can also contribute to a more stable footing during your runs.

Customer Review and Feedback

ASICS Gel Kayano 30 Review

Positive Reviews:

  • Comfort for Long Runs: Many runners say it’s super comfy for long distances. One user said, “I can run for hours without any pain!”
  • Stability: A lot of people love the stability it provides, especially for flat feet. One reviewer mentioned, “Amazing stability and comfort for long runs.”
  • Good Grip: Users are impressed with how well it grips different surfaces. One said, “Great for diverse terrains, really impressed with its grip on wet surfaces.”
  • Lightweight Design: The new design feels lighter. A customer said, “I love the new design; it feels lighter and more responsive!”
  • No Break-in Needed: Several users noted that they didn’t need to break them in at all. One said, “Perfect fit; I didn’t have to break them in at all!”

Negative Reviews:

  • Firm Foam: Some found the foam too firm at first. One user said, “Took a while to get used to; the foam was too firm at first.”
  • Breathability Issues: A few users mentioned that their feet got hot during summer runs. One said, “Not breathable enough; my feet got too hot.”
  • Pricey: Some customers think it’s a bit expensive. One mentioned, “A bit pricey compared to other options I considered.”

ASICS GT 2000 12 Review

Positive Reviews:

  • Great Support: Users love the support it offers. One said, “Incredible support without being too stiff! Perfect for long-distance runners.”
  • Lightweight Feel: Many say it feels like running on clouds. A reviewer mentioned, “Very lightweight; feels like you’re running on clouds!”
  • Durability: Customers are impressed with how well it holds up. One user said, “Exceptional durability; I’ve logged over 300 miles, and they still look great!”
  • Comfortable Cushioning: The new cushioning technology is a hit. One said, “The new cushioning technology is a game-changer for comfort!”
  • Stylish Stability: Users appreciate that it’s stylish while still providing stability. One mentioned, “Great shoe for stability without sacrificing style!”

Negative Reviews:

  • Break-in Period: Some found it needed time to break in. One user said, “Needed a little break-in time; felt tight initially.”
  • Breathability Concerns: A few reviewers mentioned it gets warm quickly. One said, “Not as breathable as I hoped; they get warm quickly.”
  • Higher Price: Some think the price is a bit high. One mentioned, “The price is a little higher, but worth it for quality!”
YOU CAN READ  Brooks Ghost Max 2 VS Asics GEL-Nimbus 26: Comparison

Which Model is More Popular Among Runners?

ASICS Gel Kayano 30

Popularity Highlights:

  • Long-standing Reputation: The Gel Kayano series has been around since 1993 and is known for its comfort and stability. Many runners have been loyal to this shoe for years, and the Kayano 30 is no exception. It’s considered one of the best stability shoes on the market.
  • Recent Upgrades: The Kayano 30 has received a lot of attention for its new features like the 4D Guidance System, which adapts to the runner’s foot and provides excellent support. This has made it even more appealing to both new and experienced runners.
  • Comfort and Performance: Runners love the plush cushioning and support, especially for long-distance runs. Many reviews highlight how it feels great even after many miles.
  • Versatile Use: Not only do runners use the Kayano 30 for running, but many wear them for daily activities, making them a versatile choice.
  • Positive Feedback: Many reviews praise the shoe for its comfort and stability, leading to a high satisfaction rate among users.

ASICS GT 2000 12

Popularity Highlights:

  • Solid Choice for Stability: The GT 2000 series is also popular among runners, especially those looking for a reliable stability shoe. It has a good reputation for providing support for overpronators.
  • Comfortable Fit: Many users appreciate the comfortable cushioning and the lightweight feel of the GT 2000 12, making it a favorite for daily training.
  • Affordable Option: Compared to the Kayano 30, the GT 2000 12 is often seen as a more budget-friendly option, which can attract more casual runners.
  • Good for Various Distances: Runners have noted that it performs well for both short and long distances, making it a versatile option.
  • Positive Reviews: While it may not have the same level of excitement as the Kayano 30, the GT 2000 12 still receives a lot of positive feedback for its performance and comfort.

User: So, which one is more popular?

Me: Based on the feedback, the ASICS Gel Kayano 30 seems to be more popular among serious runners, especially for those looking for high-level stability and comfort. The upgrades and features have made it a favorite for long-distance running.

On the other hand, the GT 2000 12 is also well-liked, especially for those who want a good stability shoe at a lower price.

Overall, if you’re looking for the shoe that most runners are excited about right now, the Gel Kayano 30 is the winner!

Asics Gel Kayano 30 VS GT 2000 12: Which One is Right for You?

Durability

User: So, which shoe is more durable overall?

Me: Overall, the ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 seems to have a slight advantage in durability, especially with its advanced upper materials and cushioning system designed for long runs.

However, the GT-2000 12 is also a solid choice, especially if you prefer a lighter shoe. Both shoes are built to last, but if you want maximum durability and comfort for longer distances, the Kayano 30 is the way to go!

Comfort

User: So, which shoe is more comfortable overall?

Me: Overall, the ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 seems to have a slight advantage in comfort, especially with its extra cushioning and adaptive support. The 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ and PureGEL® technology make it feel like you’re running on clouds, which is perfect for long distances.

However, the GT-2000 12 is also a very comfortable shoe, with good cushioning and support. It’s a great choice if you prefer a more traditional feel.

If maximum comfort is your top priority, especially for long runs, the GEL-Kayano 30 is the way to go. But both shoes are designed to keep your feet happy, no matter how far you run!

Style and Design

User: So, which shoe looks better and is more eco-friendly?

Me: Both shoes have a modern and sporty look, but the GEL-Kayano 30 might stand out a bit more with its sleek design and reflective details.

In terms of eco-friendliness, the GEL-Kayano 30 has a higher percentage of recycled materials in its upper and is designed to be vegan. However, the GT-2000 12 is also a great option with its use of recycled materials and vegan-friendly design.

If you’re looking for style and sustainability, both shoes are excellent choices, but the GEL-Kayano 30 has a slight edge in eco-friendliness!

Waterproofing and Non-Slip Grip

If you’re deciding between these two ASICS GEL-Kayano 30 and the GT-2000 12, both are not specifically designed for wet weather, they both offer good grip on wet surfaces. However, if you need a waterproof shoe, you might want to consider other options that feature a waterproof membrane.

FAQs

Which shoe is better for stability?

Both shoes are designed for stability, but the GEL-Kayano 30 has a more advanced 4D Guidance System that adapts to your foot’s movement, providing excellent support. The GT-2000 12 also offers good stability with its supportive midsole but is generally considered lighter and less clunky.

Are the GEL-Kayano 30 and GT-2000 12 waterproof?

Neither the GEL-Kayano 30 nor the GT-2000 12 is specifically waterproof. They both perform well in light rain, but if you run in heavy rain or through puddles, your feet may get wet. It’s a good idea to consider water-resistant socks for those conditions.

How do the fits of the GEL-Kayano 30 and GT-2000 12 compare?

The GEL-Kayano 30 is known for its roomy fit with a comfortable toe box and secure heel lockdown. The GT-2000 12 has a narrower fit, so you might need to go up a half size if you have wider feet. Both models are available in regular, wide, and extra-wide options.

Which shoe is more suitable for long-distance running?

The GEL-Kayano 30 is often recommended for long-distance runs due to its deeper cushioning and plush feel. It provides excellent comfort for extended periods. The GT-2000 12 is versatile and can handle shorter runs well, but it may not offer the same level of cushioning for long distances as the Kayano.

Sharing Is Caring:

Leave a Comment