Finding the perfect running shoe can be a challenge, especially when choosing between two industry-leading options like the Adrenaline GTS 24 and the GT-2000 13.
Both shoes are designed with advanced features to enhance your running experience, offering exceptional comfort, support, durability, and style. But which one truly aligns with your unique needs as a runner?
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 shines as a stability-focused shoe, delivering smooth transitions and consistent support for daily training runs.
Its engineered mesh upper ensures breathability, while the nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole offers a plush yet balanced feel underfoot.
Paired with GuideRails® technology, it’s a reliable option for runners seeking a steady and secure ride.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT-2000 13 combines lightweight performance with eco-friendly innovation.
Designed for runners who overpronate, it features FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning and a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ for responsive support.
With a sleek, modern design and sustainable materials, this shoe is ideal for those who value both performance and environmental impact.
In this detailed comparison, we’ll look how these two models stack up in terms of durability, comfort, style, and overall performance.
Whether you’re a beginner seeking everyday stability or an experienced runner looking for a responsive and adaptable ride, this guide will help you make an informed decision tailored to your running style.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and ASICS GT-2000 13: Spec Comparison Table
| Specs | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 | ASICS GT-2000 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Midsole Technology | DNA LOFT v3 | GEL and FLYTEFOAM BLAST Plus |
| Midsole Drop | 12 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Heel Height | 36.0 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Forefoot Height | 24.0 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Support System | Support | Support |
| Weight (Men’s) | 10.0oz / 283.5g | 9.7 oz / 275 g |
| Weight (Women’s) | 8.8oz / 249.5g | 8.3 oz / 235 g |
| Waterproofing | No | No |
| Widths Available | Normal, Wide | Normal, Wide, X-Wide |
| Removable Insole | YES | YES |
| Price | $140 | $140 |
| Customer Rating | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4.3/5) | – |
Upper
When comparing the uppers of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the ASICS GT-2000 13, both shoes bring unique qualities to the table, catering to different running needs.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 showcases an engineered mesh upper that excels in breathability and comfort.
Its snug fit ensures secure foot placement while allowing natural movement. Enhanced with padded heel collars, this shoe minimizes heel slippage, providing stability and support during runs.
However, its slightly thicker material can retain heat in warmer weather, which may not appeal to all runners.
The forefoot’s wide structure accommodates broader feet but tapers near the toe, potentially causing discomfort for those with a narrow fit preference.
Durable overlays around the midfoot further enhance support, making this upper an excellent choice for durability and everyday use.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT-2000 13 features a Jacquard mesh upper crafted for a balance of support and comfort. This material adapts closely to the foot, promoting breathability and keeping the feet cool during activity.
What sets the GT-2000 13 apart is its eco-conscious design, incorporating 50% recycled content, making it a sustainable pick for environmentally aware runners.
Additionally, reflective elements integrated into the upper improve safety during low-light runs, blending function with style.
While both shoes are built for comfort and support, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 leans towards everyday runners seeking long-lasting materials and stability, whereas the ASICS GT-2000 13 offers an environmentally friendly option with a focus on visibility and a sleek design. Each has its strengths, catering to varying preferences and priorities in running footwear.
Midsole
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, offering a lightweight yet plush experience. This foam adapts to your unique stride, ensuring a smooth and comfortable ride.
It strikes a balance between softness and firmness, effectively absorbing impact while avoiding an overly squishy feel. With a 12mm heel drop, redesigned for smoother transitions, the midsole promotes natural heel-to-toe movement.
It’s ideal for daily training runs and provides consistent support over long distances, though it may lack some responsiveness for speed-focused runners.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT-2000 13 employs FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning, a lightweight material that excels in shock absorption and responsiveness.
Every step feels softer, while push-offs deliver an energized rebound, making runs feel dynamic and balanced. The addition of PureGEL™ technology in the rearfoot enhances shock absorption, reducing strain on the legs and feet during landings.
ASICS also incorporates its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, ensuring stability and natural foot motion, particularly beneficial for overpronators. This midsole design shines in combining comfort, performance, and support for a variety of running distances.
While both midsoles offer advanced cushioning, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 leans toward runners seeking plush comfort and smooth transitions, perfect for steady, daily miles.
Meanwhile, the ASICS GT-2000 13 provides a more responsive and energetic ride, ideal for runners who value a balance of cushioning and performance, especially those needing extra stability. Both are excellent choices, tailored to different running needs.
Outsole
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 features a RoadTack rubber outsole, designed to deliver dependable grip and traction on various surfaces.
Whether you’re running on wet roads, dry pavement, or smooth trails, this outsole provides a secure footing, boosting your confidence with every step.
Its tread pattern complements the midsole, ensuring smooth transitions and a steady ride.
Durability is a standout feature, as the material resists wear and tear effectively, making it ideal for daily training over long distances. However, it performs best on flatter terrains and may not be suited for technical trails.
In comparison, the ASICS GT-2000 13 utilizes AHAR® (ASICS High Abrasion Rubber) with a LOW HARDNESS compound, which offers excellent durability and traction across various surfaces, including pavement and light trails.
The AHARPLUS™ heel plug rubber adds reinforcement in high-impact zones, particularly for heel strikers, extending the shoe’s lifespan. This outsole works in harmony with the midsole’s 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, promoting a balanced and stable stride.
Reflective details on the outsole further enhance safety by improving visibility during low-light runs, a thoughtful addition for runners who train early in the morning or late in the evening.
While both outsoles are built for durability and reliable performance, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in providing consistent grip and a smooth ride for everyday training on less rugged surfaces.
The ASICS GT-2000 13, on the other hand, offers added reinforcement and a more stable platform, particularly beneficial for heel strikers and those seeking enhanced visibility. Each shoe delivers long-lasting performance tailored to different running needs.
Support
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 incorporates GuideRails® technology, a standout feature that gently controls excess movement while keeping your body aligned.
This system is especially beneficial for runners who overpronate, as it helps reduce inward rolling of the foot without feeling overly restrictive.
The firm reinforcements on the medial and lateral sides ensure a balanced stride, making this shoe a dependable option for stability during long runs, speed workouts, or even strength training.
Despite its robust support, the Adrenaline GTS 24 feels natural and comfortable, catering to both overpronators and neutral runners looking for a stable ride.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is equipped with a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, designed to deliver adaptive stability. This system ensures smooth transitions from heel strike to toe-off, keeping your stride steady and balanced.
The shoe provides targeted support for runners with low arches or flat feet, effectively reducing overpronation and minimizing the risk of injuries like shin splints or plantar fasciitis.
The PureGEL™ technology and FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning further enhance the underfoot experience, combining impact absorption with responsive energy return for a stable yet cushioned feel.
Both shoes shine in their support capabilities, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 offers a more integrated and natural approach to stability, making it ideal for a wide range of runners.
Meanwhile, the ASICS GT-2000 13 emphasizes adaptive and structured support, particularly beneficial for those with specific stability requirements, such as overpronators or runners with flat feet.
Either option provides reliable support, helping runners stay confident and comfortable on their journey.
Fit & Sizing
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 fits true to size for most runners, though slight adjustments may be needed due to design updates.
The snug heel fit, complemented by moderate padding, minimizes slippage, while the stiff heel counter provides added support.
Some runners with sensitive heels might require a break-in period to adjust to the firmness. The forefoot is slightly tapered but offers more width than earlier versions, accommodating a variety of foot shapes.
However, runners seeking extra room might consider sizing up or modifying the lacing for a customized fit.
While the midfoot area provides moderate flexibility, the non-gusseted tongue requires careful adjustment to secure a snug and supportive fit.
The ASICS GT-2000 13, on the other hand, also fits true to size and offers a glove-like fit right out of the box.
Designed with overpronators in mind, it ensures a secure fit for those with low arches or flat feet, preventing excessive inward rolling during runs.
The engineered Jacquard mesh upper enhances the fit by providing a supportive foothold and breathability.
Additionally, the soft OrthoLite™ X-30 sock liner adds cushioning, boosting comfort for longer runs.
With its 8 mm heel drop and lightweight construction (275 g/9.7 oz), the GT-2000 13 feels natural on the foot, promoting smooth transitions while maintaining stability.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and ASICS GT-2000 13: Which One is Right for You?
Durability
Both shoes are built to last, with high-quality materials designed to withstand daily wear and tear. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 features a durable RoadTack rubber outsole, offering excellent traction and long-term reliability, making it perfect for consistent training over various surfaces. Its midsole and upper materials also hold up well, ensuring steady performance over time.
The ASICS GT-2000 13, with its AHAR® rubber and reinforced AHARPLUS™ heel plug, excels in durability, particularly in high-impact areas like the heel. This added reinforcement extends the shoe’s lifespan, especially for heel strikers, making it a dependable choice for long-term use. Whether running on pavement or light trails, both options ensure durability, but the ASICS GT-2000 13 edges ahead with its added heel protection.
Comfort
Comfort is a highlight for both shoes, though they cater to different needs. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 offers plush DNA Loft v3 cushioning in the midsole, which provides a soft yet slightly firm feel. It adapts to your stride, making it suitable for long runs and daily training. However, the snug fit and slightly tapered toe box might feel tight for runners with wider feet.
The ASICS GT-2000 13 takes comfort a step further with its FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning and PureGEL™ technology, delivering a softer underfoot feel with responsive energy return. The engineered Jacquard mesh upper enhances breathability, while the OrthoLite™ X-30 sock liner adds extra cushioning, ensuring a comfortable experience even during extended runs. For those seeking a plush, responsive ride, the ASICS GT-2000 13 is a clear winner.
Style
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 leans towards a classic running shoe design with a sporty look, suitable for those who prefer understated yet functional styles. Its engineered mesh upper and supportive overlays strike a balance between performance and aesthetics.
In contrast, the ASICS GT-2000 13 offers a sleeker and more modern design. Reflective elements add a stylish yet functional touch, improving visibility during low-light runs. Its eco-friendly upper, crafted from recycled materials, not only enhances sustainability but also adds to its contemporary appeal. Style-conscious runners looking for a shoe that stands out may find the ASICS GT-2000 13 more appealing.
Overall Performance
When it comes to overall performance, both shoes excel but in different areas. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 is a reliable workhorse for runners seeking stability and smooth transitions. Its GuideRails® technology ensures a balanced stride, while the midsole and outsole combine for a consistent, dependable ride.
The ASICS GT-2000 13, on the other hand, shines in adaptability and responsiveness. Its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ provides excellent support for overpronators, while the cushioning technologies offer a dynamic and energized run. It’s a versatile option for runners who need stability and enjoy a responsive feel.
Weight can play a essential role in overall performance, especially for runners focused on speed and efficiency. The lighter weight of the ASICS GT-2000 13 gives it an edge for runners who value a more agile ride, while the slightly heavier Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 provides added stability and support, which might benefit those seeking a secure, steady stride.
Final Verdict
Both the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and ASICS GT-2000 13 are exceptional running shoes, but the right choice depends on your specific needs:
- Choose the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 if you value consistent support, smooth transitions, and a classic, reliable design. It’s perfect for daily training and runners who prioritize durability and stability.
- Opt for the ASICS GT-2000 13 if you prefer a light weight, modern design, eco-friendly features, and a more responsive, cushioned ride. Its stability-focused technologies make it a top pick for overpronators or those who want a plush yet dynamic running experience.
Ultimately, both shoes deliver premium performance and comfort, leaving you with a tough but rewarding decision to make.
Want to dive deeper into each shoe? Check out our detailed reviews: