ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13: Shoe Comparison Review

Hey there! Are you looking for a new pair of running shoes but not sure which ASICS GT 1000 model to get – the GT 1000 12 or the GT 1000 13?

Don’t worry, I’ve got you covered! I am going to break down the key differences between these two popular shoes so you can decide which one is best for you.

Feature Comparison: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

FeatureASICS GT-1000 12ASICS GT-1000 13
Midsole TechnologyRearfootGEL and FLYTEFOAMRearfoot PureGEL and FLYTEFOAM
Midsole Drop9.0 mm8.0 mm
Heel Height30.0 mm36.0 mm
Forefoot Height22.0 mm28.0 mm
Support SystemNeutral, StabilityNeutral, Stability
Weight (Men’s) Size 99.4 oz / 270 g9.5 oz / 270 g
Weight (Women’s) Size 98.3 oz / 240 g8.3 oz / 235 g
WaterproofingNoNo
Widths AvailableNormal, Wide, X-WideNormal, Wide, X-Wide
Removable InsoleYESYES
Price$100$110$99.95
Customer Rating4.55 out of 54.55 out of 5

Durability

Durability: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

Upper

The upper on the GT 1000 12 is made from an engineered mesh that provides breathability and a soft, snug fit around your foot. It also features a tongue wing construction to ensure a supportive and secure fit.

In contrast, the GT 1000 13 has a similar engineered mesh upper but introduces a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, which helps with adaptive stability. While both uppers are durable, the added structure in the GT 1000 13 may offer a bit more support, especially for runners who need extra stability over time.

Midsole

Both models utilize ASICS’ FLYTEFOAM® cushioning for lightweight impact absorption, but there’s a difference in how the shoes feel during your run. The GT 1000 12 incorporates LITETRUSS® technology to reduce overpronation and offer midfoot support.

Whereas the GT 1000 13 has upgraded to PureGEL™ technology in the rearfoot. This change in the GT 1000 13 provides softer landings and better shock absorption, which can contribute to long-term comfort and durability.

Outsole

The outsole of both the GT 1000 12 and GT 1000 13 is built to handle road surfaces, with durable rubber that provides traction and helps extend the life of the shoe. However, both models are similar in this regard, so there isn’t much difference in the outsole durability between the two.

Comfort

Comfort: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

Cushioning

The ASICS GT 1000 12 uses FLYTEFOAM® cushioning in the midsole and features Rearfoot GEL® technology to help with shock absorption. This gives you a nice soft feel when your foot strikes the ground, especially on long runs.

In the GT 1000 13, ASICS replaced the GEL® with PureGEL™ technology, which makes the landings even softer. Both shoes feel light, but the GT 1000 13 is slightly better at absorbing impact, making it a bit more comfortable for long-distance runs.

Arch Support

Both the GT 1000 12 and 13 are designed for runners who either have normal arches (neutral pronation) or flat feet (overpronation). The GT 1000 12 uses LITETRUSS® technology to support the midfoot and control pronation.

While the GT 1000 13 adds the 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ for adaptive stability. This makes the GT 1000 13 a little more supportive, especially for those with overpronation issues, helping to maintain a balanced stride.

YOU CAN READ  ASICS Novablast 5 VS Brooks Glycerin Max: Comparison Review

Fit & Sizing

Both models feature an engineered mesh upper that wraps the foot comfortably. The GT 1000 12 has a soft mesh upper and a tongue wing construction that helps hold the foot in place.

The GT 1000 13 has a similar design but with slight improvements for a snugger fit and better breathability. The sizing for both shoes is consistent, so if one fits you well, the other should too. However, the new shape of the GT 1000 13’s upper might feel a little more supportive.

Style

Style: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

Both the ASICS GT 1000 12 and GT 1000 13 have stylish designs that look good for running or casual wear, but there are a few differences in their appearance.

The GT 1000 12 has a modern shape and a soft mesh upper that wraps around your foot. The heel shape is also new, giving it a fresh look, and the tongue wing construction adds a sporty feel. It comes in a variety of colors, so you can choose what suits your style.

The GT 1000 13 is also updated with a more stylish design. It has the same engineered mesh upper, but with a cleaner look. The 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ is part of its modern design, offering more structure and support. It also includes PureGEL™ technology, which not only improves comfort but adds to the shoe’s sleek appearance.

Waterproofing

Waterproofing: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

Waterproofing

The GT 1000 12 and GT 1000 13 have breathable mesh uppers that allow airflow, keeping your feet cool during runs. While this helps with comfort, it means they aren’t waterproof.

If you run in light rain or on wet surfaces, the shoes will offer some resistance, but they can still get soaked in heavier conditions.

Non-Slip Grip

The outsoles of both the GT 1000 12 and GT 1000 13 are designed to provide good traction on road surfaces. This helps with grip on wet roads, reducing the chances of slipping.

The GT 1000 13 may have a slight edge due to its updated design and 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, which offers better stability. However, for very wet or slippery conditions, they aren’t specifically made for high slip resistance like trail running shoes.

Customer Review and Feedback: ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13

ASICS GT 1000 12

Positive Reviews:

  1. Comfortable Fit: Many users found the shoes very comfortable, especially for long runs, thanks to the GEL cushioning.
  2. Lightweight Design: Reviewers appreciated how light the shoes felt on their feet, making them easy to run in.
  3. Breathable Upper: The redesigned mesh upper allowed for good airflow, keeping feet cool during workouts.
  4. Good Stability: Runners noted that the shoes provided excellent stability, which is great for overpronators.
  5. Durable Outsole: The AHAR rubber outsole received praise for its durability and traction on various surfaces.

Negative Reviews:

  1. Finicky Lacing System: Some users struggled with the laces, finding it hard to get a secure fit without retightening multiple times.
  2. Energy Return Issues: A few runners felt that the shoe lacked sufficient energy return during toe-off, making it less responsive.
  3. Tightness Around the Midfoot: Some reviewers mentioned that the fit was too tight in certain areas, leading to discomfort.

ASICS GT 1000 13

Positive Reviews:

  1. Enhanced Comfort: Users loved the improved cushioning and comfort level, making them ideal for daily runs.
  2. Better Stability Features: The new 3D Guidance System was praised for providing better stability and support.
  3. True to Size Fit: Many found that the shoes fit true to size, which is important for runners looking for a reliable fit.
  4. Improved Breathability: Reviewers noted that the engineered mesh upper offered great breathability and comfort.
  5. Lightweight Feel: The combination of FLYTEFOAM and PureGEL technology made the shoes feel light and responsive.
YOU CAN READ  Hoka Mach 5 VS Arahi 6: Which Running Shoe Is Best?

Negative Reviews:

  1. Short Laces Issue: Some users reported that the laces were too short, making it difficult to achieve a comfortable fit.
  2. Width Concerns: A few runners mentioned that the shoe felt wider than expected, affecting their overall experience.
  3. Cushioning Too Soft for Some: While many liked the cushioning, some felt it was too soft and lacked the necessary support.

ASICS GT 1000 12 vs GT 1000 13: Which Model is More Popular Among Runners?

ASICS GT 1000 12

Popularity Highlights:

  • Budget-Friendly Option: The GT 1000 12 is often highlighted as an affordable choice for new runners. Many appreciate its low price while still offering decent quality and comfort.
  • Versatile Performance: Reviewers note that this shoe is good for various activities, from daily runs to speed work. Its balanced cushioning makes it suitable for different types of runners.
  • Strong Stability Features: Many users praise the stability provided by the traditional medial post, which helps prevent injuries for those who overpronate.
  • Durable Construction: Runners have mentioned that the outsole holds up well over time, making it a reliable option for regular use.
  • Good Fit: Several reviews highlight that the shoe fits true to size, providing a snug yet comfortable feel during runs.

ASICS GT 1000 13

Popularity Highlights:

  • Expert Recommendations: The GT 1000 13 is frequently recommended by running experts as a solid entry-level stability shoe. It offers a great balance of support and comfort, making it popular among both new and experienced runners.
  • Improved Cushioning: Users love the enhanced cushioning in this model, which provides a plush feel while still being responsive. This makes it ideal for longer runs.
  • Strong Community Support: The shoe has gained a strong following in running communities, with many sharing positive experiences about its comfort and support.
  • Versatile Daily Trainer: Many runners appreciate that the GT 1000 13 performs well in various conditions, making it a dependable choice for everyday training.
  • True to Size Fit: Reviewers often mention that the shoe fits as expected, which is important for runners looking for a reliable fit.

ASICS GT 1000 12 VS GT 1000 13: Which One is Right for You?

Durability

The GT 1000 12 is a great choice if you want a comfortable and supportive shoe. It’s especially good for people who have overpronation, which means their foot rolls inward when they run. This shoe fits snugly and lets your feet breathe, so you’ll stay cool and comfortable. If you don’t need a lot of extra stability, the GT 1000 12 will work well for you.

The GT 1000 13 is better if you need more stability and softer cushioning, especially for long runs. It has the 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ and PureGEL™ technology, which give extra support and make landings softer. This shoe is a good pick if your feet get tired easily or if you overpronate and need extra comfort.

Comfort

If you want a soft and supportive shoe, the GT 1000 12 is a great choice, especially if you don’t need the extra stability.

But if you need even more support and softer landings, especially for longer runs or if you have flat feet, the GT 1000 13 is the better option.

Style

If you want a sporty, modern shoe with lots of color options, the GT 1000 12 is a great choice. But if you prefer a cleaner, more structured design with added comfort, go for the GT 1000 13.

Waterproofing

If you run mostly on dry or lightly wet roads and want a shoe with a good grip, either the GT 1000 12 or GT 1000 13 will work well.

If you need a bit more stability and don’t mind them not being waterproof, the GT 1000 13 is a slightly better option.

Sharing Is Caring:

Leave a Comment