When choosing between the ASICS GT 1000 13 and the GT 2000 13, it’s important to understand how they differ. Both shoes are designed for stability, but they cater to different needs and budgets. Let’s break it down in simple terms.
| Feature | ASICS GT 1000 13 | ASICS GT-2000 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Midsole Technology | GEL and FLYTEFOAM | GEL and FLYTEFOAM BLAST Plus |
| Midsole Drop | 8.0 mm | 8.0 mm |
| Heel Height | 36.0 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Forefoot Height | 28.0 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Support System | Neutral, Stability | Neutral, Stability |
| Weight (Men’s) | 9.5 oz / 270 g | 9.7 oz / 275 g |
| Weight (Women’s) | 8.3 oz / 235 | 8.3 oz / 235 g |
| Waterproofing | No | No |
| Widths Available | Normal, Wide, X-Wide | Normal, Wide, X-Wide |
| Removable Insole | YES | YES |
| Price | $110 | $140 |
| Customer Rating | 4.55 out of 5 | _ |
Durability
When it comes to running shoes, durability is super important. You want your shoes to last, especially if you’re going to be running a lot. Let’s compare the ASICS GT 1000 13 and the GT 2000 13 in different parts of the shoe.
Upper
The ASICS GT 1000 13 has an engineered mesh upper. This means it’s designed to be breathable and soft, which is great for keeping your feet comfortable while you run.
On the other hand, ASICS GT 2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper. It’s also supportive and comfortable, but it’s made with at least 50% recycled materials. This is a cool way to help the environment while making a strong shoe!
Midsole
The ASICS GT 1000 13 midsole has FLYTEFOAM® cushioning and PureGEL™ technology. This helps with shock absorption, making your landings softer. It’s a good balance of comfort and support for daily runs.
In contrast, ASICS GT 2000 13 has a full-length FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning unit along with PureGEL™ technology. This combination gives you a bouncier feel and more energy when you push off the ground. It’s perfect for longer runs where you need extra comfort.
Outsole
The GT 1000 outsole is designed to be durable, but it uses regular blown rubber in the forefoot. This means it might wear out a little faster if you run a lot on tough surfaces.
In comparison, The GT 2000 has an AHARPLUS™ heel plug rubber, which is tougher and lasts longer. It also has an AHAR® LOW HARDNESS outsole material that helps resist wear and tear. This means it can handle more miles without breaking down.
Weight Comparison
The ASICS GT 1000 13 weight is about 9.5 oz (270 g) for men and 8.3 oz (235 g) for women. It’s lightweight, which is great for speed.
The ASICS GT 2000 13 is slightly heavier at 9.7 oz (275 g) for men and the same 8.3 oz (235 g) for women. The extra weight comes from the added cushioning and support features.
Comfort
Cushioning
The ASICS GT 1000 13 has a regular cushioning setup that includes FLYTEFOAM® technology and PureGEL™ in the rearfoot. This combination helps provide a lightweight feel with decent shock absorption, making it suitable for shorter runs and daily activities. However, it might not feel as bouncy or responsive for longer distances.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT 2000 13 features a more advanced cushioning system with full-length FF BLAST™ PLUS foam and PureGEL™ technology. This setup offers a softer, cloud-like feel and better energy return, making it ideal for longer runs.
Runners often find that the GT 2000 13 provides a more comfortable experience over extended distances.
Arch Support
Both shoes are designed for neutral and overpronation support. The GT 1000 13 is great for those with normal-sized arches and offers a stable ride thanks to its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™. This helps keep your foot balanced as you run. It’s less likely to cause injuries due to its effective shock absorption, but neutral runners should still be cautious.
The GT 2000 13 also supports normal arches and those with low arches or flat feet. It has a more advanced stability system that adapts to your foot’s movement, providing a smoother transition from heel strike to toe-off.
This shoe is particularly helpful for runners who tend to overpronate, helping to prevent injuries like shin splints and plantar fasciitis.
Fit and Sizing
The ASICS GT 1000 13 features an engineered mesh upper that is breathable and wraps around your foot nicely. It fits true to size and comes in regular, wide, and extra-wide options, making it accessible for different foot shapes.
In contrast, the GT 2000 13 has a jacquard mesh upper that feels a bit more premium. It offers a snug fit, so some runners may need to go up half a size, especially if they have wider feet. Like the GT 1000, it also comes in various widths, ensuring that most runners can find a comfortable fit.
Style
ASICS GT 1000 13
The GT 1000 13 features an engineered mesh upper that is flexible and breathable. This design helps keep your feet cool and comfortable during runs.
The shoe has a more straightforward look, making it a versatile option for both running and casual wear. It comes in various colors, allowing you to choose a pair that matches your style.
ASICS GT 2000 13
The GT 2000 13 has a jacquard mesh upper that feels a bit more premium. This shoe looks more sophisticated and is designed to offer a snug fit.
The GT 2000 also comes in a variety of colors, but its design elements give it a more modern and stylish appearance.
The use of recycled materials in the upper not only helps the environment but also adds to its appeal.
Waterproofing and Non-Slip Grip
Waterproofing
The ASICS GT 1000 13 has an engineered mesh upper that is breathable and helps keep your feet cool. However, it is not waterproof, so your feet may get wet if you run in the rain or step into puddles. The mesh material dries quickly, but it’s not the best option if you need a waterproof shoe.
On the other hand, the ASICS GT 2000 13 does not have any special waterproofing features. Like the GT 1000 13, it has a breathable mesh upper that is not waterproof.
If you need a shoe that can keep your feet dry in wet conditions, you may want to look for a different model that has a waterproof membrane or a different type of upper material.
Non-Slip Grip
Both the ASICS GT 1000 13 and the GT 2000 13 have good non-slip grip on dry surfaces. The outsoles of both shoes are made with rubber that provides traction on pavement and other hard surfaces.
The GT 2000 13 has a slightly more advanced outsole material called AHAR® LOW HARDNESS, which helps improve resistance against wear and tear.
However, neither shoe is designed for use on slippery or wet surfaces. The rubber outsoles may provide some grip on wet surfaces, but they are not as effective as shoes with specialized outsoles designed for trail running or hiking.
If you plan to run on wet or slippery surfaces, you may want to consider a shoe with more aggressive lugs or a different type of outsole material.
Customer Review and Feedback: ASICS GT 1000 13 vs GT 2000 13
ASICS GT 1000 13 Reviews
Positive Reviews
- “The GT 1000 13 is a great stability shoe for daily training. It’s comfortable, durable, and versatile enough for running errands and walking the dog.”
- “I’ve been running in the GT 1000 series for years and this latest version is one of the best yet. The PureGEL technology provides excellent cushioning and support.”
- “As a heel striker, I really appreciate the moderate support and guidance this shoe offers. The ride is smooth and stable, even on longer runs.”
- “For the price, you can’t beat the value of the GT 1000 13. It has all the features I need in a running shoe without breaking the bank.”
- “The GT 1000 13 is a great option for new runners looking for a reliable, beginner-friendly stability shoe. The fit is true to size and the shoe requires minimal break-in time.”
Negative Reviews
- “While the GT 1000 13 is a solid stability shoe, it lacks the responsiveness I prefer in my running shoes. The FlyteFoam midsole feels a bit flat and uninspiring.”
- “For extreme heel strikers, the 10mm drop of the GT 1000 13 may not provide the best geometry. A higher offset shoe might be a better choice.”
- “I wish ASICS would update the styling of the GT 1000 series. The look is a bit dated and boring compared to some of the more modern stability shoes on the market.”
ASICS GT 2000 13 Reviews
As of now, there are no customer reviews available for the Asics GT 2000 13.
Which Model is More Popular Among Runners?
ASICS GT 1000 13
Popularity Highlights
- Expert Recommendations: Running experts often recommend the ASICS GT 1000 13 for its solid performance as an entry-level stability shoe. It provides a good balance of support and comfort, making it suitable for both new runners and those looking for a reliable daily trainer. While it may not have all the advanced features of higher-end models, it is praised for delivering a responsive ride at a more affordable price.
- Versatile Choice: The GT 1000 13 is known for its versatility, working well for various types of runners. It’s a great option for those who need a shoe that can handle daily training without breaking the bank. Many runners appreciate its ability to perform well in different conditions, making it a dependable choice for everyday use.
- Strong Community Presence: The ASICS GT 1000 13 has a strong presence in running communities. Many runners discuss its comfort and support, especially for those who overpronate. It’s frequently mentioned as a great value-for-money option, with many runners sharing their positive experiences and recommending it to others looking for a reliable stability shoe.
Asics GT 2000 13
Popularity Highlights:
- Expert Recommendations: Running experts often recommend the GT 2000 13 for its balance of support and responsiveness, making it a great choice for tempo runs as well as longer distances.
- Versatile Choice: The GT 2000 13 is known for being a versatile shoe that works well for various types of runners. It’s a solid option for both beginners and experienced runners looking for a reliable daily trainer.
- Positive Reviews: This model also enjoys good ratings, often ranking in the top 30% of running shoes. Runners appreciate its lightweight feel and good traction, making it suitable for different terrains.
- Strong Community Presence: Like the Kayano, the GT 2000 13 is frequently discussed in running communities. Many users mention its comfort and support, especially for those who need a moderate stability shoe.
ASICS GT 1000 13 VS GT 2000 13: Which One is Right for You?
Durability
If you want a really tough running shoe, the ASICS GT 2000 13 is a great choice. It has a strong mesh upper made from at least half recycled materials, which makes it durable.
The bottom of the shoe has special rubber that’s designed to last a long time and handle rough surfaces. This means it’s good for people who run a lot and need a shoe that won’t wear out quickly.
The GT 1000 13 is also durable but uses regular rubber in the front, so it might wear out a little faster than the GT 2000 13.
Comfort
If you’re looking for a super comfy and bouncy shoe, the ASICS GT 2000 13 is made just for that. It has extra soft cushioning and special technology that makes your run feel nice and cushioned, which is great for long runs.
The GT 1000 13 is comfy too, with good cushioning, but it might not feel as soft or bouncy as the GT 2000 13 if you’re running for a long time.
Style
Regarding style, the ASICS GT 1000 13 has a simple design that’s good for running and everyday wear. It comes in a bunch of colors and has a breathable mesh upper.
The GT 2000 13 looks a bit fancier with its premium mesh and modern design. It also comes in various colors and uses recycled materials, making it stylish and eco-friendly.
Waterproofing and Grip
Neither the ASICS GT 1000 13 nor the GT 2000 13 are waterproof. Both have mesh uppers that let your feet breathe but won’t keep them dry if it rains heavily. If you need a shoe that can handle wet conditions, you might need to look for a GTX model.
For grip, both shoes have good traction on dry surfaces. The GT 2000 13’s outsole is a bit better at resisting wear, but neither shoe is made for slippery or wet surfaces. If you run on slippery surfaces often, you might want a shoe with better grip features.
FAQs
What is the main difference between the GT 1000 13 and GT 2000 13?
The biggest difference is that the GT 2000 13 is made for longer runs and offers more support and cushioning. It’s great for daily training and can handle various distances. The GT 1000 13 is better for shorter runs and workouts, making it a good choice for beginners or casual runners.
Which shoe is better for overpronators?
If you overpronate, which means your feet roll inward when you run, the GT 2000 13 is the better option. It has special features like the 3D Guidance System that help keep your feet stable. The GT 1000 13 also provides support, but it’s not as strong as the GT 2000.
Are both shoes comfortable for running?
Yes! Both shoes are designed to be comfortable. The GT 2000 13 has extra cushioning and a soft feel, making it great for long runs. The GT 1000 13 is also comfortable but might feel a bit firmer because it’s made for shorter distances.
Can I use these shoes for walking or gym workouts?
Absolutely! Both the GT 1000 13 and GT 2000 13 can be used for walking and gym workouts. The GT 1000 13 is especially good for gym activities because it’s lightweight and flexible. The GT 2000 13 can also work well for gym sessions, especially if you’re doing more running or cardio.
How do I know which shoe fits me best?
To find the best fit, it’s a good idea to try both shoes on if you can. The GT 1000 13 has a snug fit, while the GT 2000 13 offers a bit more room. You can also check online size guides or use the ASICS Shoe Finder quiz to h