Today, let’s chat about two popular choices from ASICS: the Gel Kayano 31 and the GT 2000 13. Imagine you’re trying to decide between two cool new sneakers for gym class. You want to know which one feels better, looks cooler, and helps you run faster.
The ASICS Gel Kayano 31 is known for its super comfy cushioning and stability, making it a favorite for long runs. It’s like wearing a soft cloud on your feet!
On the other hand, the Asics GT 2000 13 is lighter and more versatile, perfect for those who like to switch between running and other activities. It’s a bit like having a trusty pair of sneakers that can handle anything you throw at them.
Feature Comparison: Asics Gel Kayano 31 VS GT 2000 13
| Feature | Asics Gel Kayano 31 | ASICS GT-2000 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Midsole Technology | GEL and FF BLAST Plus ECCO | GEL and FF BLAST Plus |
| Midsole Drop | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Heel Height | 40.0 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Forefoot Height | 30.0 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Support System | Neutral, Stability | Neutral, Stability |
| Weight (Men’s) | 10.7 oz / 305 g | 9.7 oz / 275 g |
| Weight (Women’s) | 9.3 oz / 266 g | 8.3 oz / 235 g |
| Waterproofing | No | No |
| Widths Available | Normal, Wide, X-Wide | Normal, Wide, X-Wide |
| Removable Insole | YES | YES |
| Price | $160 | $140 |
| Customer Rating | 4.6 out of 5 | _ |
Durability
When choosing between the ASICS Gel Kayano 31 and the GT 2000 13, durability is a big deal. Let’s break down how these two shoes hold up over time.
Upper
The Gel Kayano 31 features an engineered mesh upper, which is designed to be breathable and comfortable. It has a snug fit that keeps your foot secure, and the materials used are high-quality, making it quite durable.
On the other hand, the GT 2000 13 has a jacquard mesh upper that is also breathable but includes at least 50% recycled content. This not only helps the environment but also adds to its durability. The GT 2000’s upper might not feel as premium as the Kayano’s, but it still holds up well against wear and tear.
Midsole
Both shoes have impressive midsole technologies. The Gel Kayano 31 uses FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning and PureGEL™ technology, which provide a plush feel and excellent shock absorption. This means it can take a beating during long runs without losing comfort.
The GT 2000 13 also features FF BLAST™ PLUS and PureGEL™, but it has a slightly firmer feel. This makes it a bit more responsive, especially for quicker paces, while still offering good cushioning for daily training. Both midsoles are designed to last, but the Kayano’s softer cushioning may wear down faster over time if used for intense workouts.
Outsole
When it comes to the outsole, both shoes are equipped with Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ technology, which provides excellent traction. The Gel Kayano 31 is built for road running but can handle mild trails, showing great durability with minimal wear even after many miles.
The GT 2000 13 features a combination of AHARPLUS™ and AHAR® LOW HARDNESS rubber, which enhances durability and grip. This shoe excels in durability tests, especially in the heel area, making it a reliable choice for daily training.
Weight Comparison
In terms of weight, the Gel Kayano 31 is heavier, weighing about 10.7 oz (305 g) for men and 9.3 oz (266 g) for women. This added weight comes from its plush cushioning and stability features.
The GT 2000 13, however, is lighter, weighing 9.7 oz (275 g) for men and 8.3 oz (235 g) for women. This makes it feel less clunky and more agile, which can be a big plus if you prefer a lighter shoe for your runs.
Comfort
Cushioning
The Gel Kayano 31 is all about maximum cushioning. It uses FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO and PureGEL™ technology, which makes it feel like you’re running on clouds! This shoe is designed to absorb shock really well, so your feet feel comfy even after long runs.
On the flip side, the GT 2000 13 also has great cushioning, but it’s a bit firmer. It features a full-length FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning unit along with PureGEL™ technology. This gives you a nice balance of softness and responsiveness, which can help you feel energized during your runs. So, if you like a little more bounce in your step, the GT 2000 might be your pick!
Arch Support
Both shoes provide good arch support, but they cater to different foot types. The Gel Kayano 31 is designed for neutral runners and those with overpronation. It has a 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ that helps keep your foot stable and supported, which is super helpful if you have normal-sized arches.
The GT 2000 13 also supports neutral and overpronation runners. It features a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ that adapts to your foot’s needs, providing stability during your run. If you have low arches or flat feet, this shoe can help prevent injuries like shin splints and plantar fasciitis.
Fit & Sizing
When it comes to fit, the Gel Kayano 31 has an engineered mesh upper that improves breathability and gives a snug feel. It also has a knit heel pull tab, making it easy to slip on and off. The shoe tends to fit true to size, so you can feel confident ordering your regular size.
The GT 2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper that offers a supportive and comfortable fit. It’s made with at least 50% recycled content, which is a nice bonus for the planet! This shoe also fits true to size, but some runners say it feels a bit roomier in the toe box, which can be great if you like a little extra space for your toes.
Style
When it comes to style, both the ASICS Gel Kayano 31 and the GT 2000 13 have their own unique looks. Let’s take a closer look at how they compare.
The Gel Kayano 31 has a sleek, modern design with a breathable engineered mesh upper. It comes in a variety of cool colors like Blue Expanse/Digital Aqua, Smog Green/Black, and Light Celadon/Safety Yellow. The shoe has a premium look and feel, thanks to its plush materials and attention to detail.
The GT 2000 13, on the other hand, has a more traditional stability shoe look. It features a jacquard mesh upper that is also breathable and comes in a range of colors. While it may not have the same luxurious look as the Kayano, the GT 2000 still has a sharp, sporty vibe.
Both shoes have reflective elements for added visibility, which is great if you like to run at night or in low-light conditions. The Kayano has reflective details on the heel, while the GT 2000 also has reflective accents throughout the upper.
In terms of fit, the Gel Kayano 31 has a snug, secure fit thanks to its engineered mesh upper and padded heel counter. It comes in regular, wide (2E), and extra wide (4E) versions to accommodate different foot shapes. The GT 2000 13 also has a supportive fit, but some runners find it runs a bit narrow, so you may want to go up a half size or opt for the wide version if you have wider feet.
Waterproofing and Non-Slip Grip
Waterproofing
The ASICS GEL-Kayano 31 is not designed to be fully waterproof. It has a breathable upper made of engineered mesh, which helps keep your feet comfortable during runs. However, if you find yourself running in heavy rain or through puddles, your feet might get wet since there’s no waterproof layer.
On the other hand, the GT-2000 13 also lacks a waterproof feature. It features a jacquard mesh upper that provides good breathability and comfort. Just like the Kayano, it won’t keep your feet dry in wet conditions. If you often run in the rain, you might want to consider wearing water-resistant socks or looking for shoes specifically made for wet weather.
Non-Slip Grip
Now, let’s talk about grip. The GEL-Kayano 31 has an improved outsole with ASICS HybridGrip technology. This combines two types of rubber: a durable one for high-wear areas and a softer one for better traction. This design gives you a solid grip on various surfaces, making it easier to run on wet roads without slipping.
The GT-2000 13 also comes with a reliable outsole that provides good traction. It’s designed to handle different surfaces, including wet ones, so you can feel confident while running. Both shoes have features that help with stability, but the Kayano 31’s HybridGrip might give it a slight edge in slippery conditions.
Customer Review and Feedback: Asics Gel Kayano 31 VS GT 2000 13
Asics Gel Kayano 31
Positive Reviews:
- Comfort and Cushioning: Many users appreciate the plush cushioning, stating that it feels great for long runs and provides excellent support.
- Stability: Runners have noted that the stability features help with overpronation, making it a reliable choice for those needing extra support.
- Durability: Customers have reported that the shoe holds up well over time, with many logging significant miles without noticeable wear.
- Fit: Reviewers often mention that the Kayano fits true to size and offers a comfortable toe box, which is great for longer distances.
- Smooth Transition: Users have highlighted the smooth transition from heel to toe, which enhances the running experience, especially on longer runs.
Negative Reviews:
- Weight: Some runners find the Gel Kayano 31 to be heavier compared to other models, which can be a drawback for speed work or racing.
- Clunky Feel: A few users mentioned that the heel feels clunky, especially during the first few runs until the shoe breaks in.
- Price: At around $165, some customers feel the shoe is too expensive, especially when compared to other stability options.
Asics GT 2000 13
As of now, there are no customer reviews available for the Asics GT 2000 13.
Which Model is More Popular Among Runners?
Asics Gel Kayano 31
Popularity Highlights:
- Long-Standing Reputation: The Gel Kayano series has been around since 1993 and is known for its stability and comfort. Many runners trust this shoe for long distances, especially those who overpronate.
- High Ratings: The Gel Kayano 31 has received a lot of positive reviews, ranking in the top 25% of running shoes on various platforms. It’s often praised for its plush cushioning and adaptive stability, making it a favorite for marathon runners and casual joggers alike.
- Frequent Recommendations: Many running blogs and experts recommend the Kayano 31 for its balance of comfort and support. This shoe is often highlighted in discussions about the best stability shoes available.
- Community Feedback: Runners frequently share their positive experiences on social media and running forums, boosting their popularity. The shoe’s design improvements, like the new knit collar and breathable upper, have also been well-received.
- Sales Figures: The Gel Kayano 31 is often one of the best-selling models in the Asics lineup, indicating strong consumer demand.
Asics GT 2000 13
Popularity Highlights:
- Expert Recommendations: Running experts often recommend the GT 2000 13 for its balance of support and responsiveness, making it a great choice for tempo runs as well as longer distances.
- Versatile Choice: The GT 2000 13 is known for being a versatile shoe that works well for various types of runners. It’s a solid option for both beginners and experienced runners looking for a reliable daily trainer.
- Positive Reviews: This model also enjoys good ratings, often ranking in the top 30% of running shoes. Runners appreciate its lightweight feel and good traction, making it suitable for different terrains.
- Strong Community Presence: Like the Kayano, the GT 2000 13 is frequently discussed in running communities. Many users mention its comfort and support, especially for those who need a moderate stability shoe.
Asics Gel Kayano 31 VS GT 2000 13: Which One is Right for You?
Durability
If you’re looking for a shoe that offers top-notch durability, the Gel Kayano 31 might be the better choice, especially for long-distance runners who need that plush comfort.
However, if you prefer a lighter shoe that still holds up well over time, the GT 2000 13 could be the way to go. Both shoes are built to last, but your choice may depend on your running style and preferences!
Comfort
If you’re looking for maximum cushioning and a plush feel, the Gel Kayano 31 is the way to go. It’s especially good for long runs where comfort is key.
However, if you prefer a shoe that offers a bit more responsiveness and bounce, the GT 2000 13 might be your best bet.
Both shoes provide excellent arch support and a comfortable fit, so it really depends on what you like best!
Style
If you’re looking for a shoe with a modern and premium look, the Gel Kayano 31 is likely your best bet. Its stylish design and variety of colors make it a favorite among many runners.
However, if you prefer a more traditional, sporty style, the GT 2000 13 could be the right choice for you.
Waterproofing and Non-Slip Grip
If you often run in wet conditions, neither shoe is fully waterproof, so you might want to consider water-resistant socks to keep your feet dry.
However, for grip, the Gel Kayano 31 may have a slight advantage due to its HybridGrip technology, which offers better traction on slippery surfaces. If you prioritize stability and grip, the Kayano 31 could be the better choice.
On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter shoe with solid traction, the GT 2000 13 is still a great option!
FAQs
What are the main differences in cushioning between the Gel Kayano 31 and GT 2000 13?
The Gel Kayano 31 has a plush cushioning system with FF Blast+ Eco foam and PureGel technology, making it feel very soft and comfortable for long runs. It’s designed for stability and has a higher stack height.
On the other hand, the GT 2000 13 uses FlyteFoam, which is lighter and offers a firmer feel, making it more responsive. So, if you want a softer ride, go for the Kayano; if you prefer a more dynamic feel, the GT 2000 is the way to go!
Which shoe is better for stability?
If you need extra stability, the Gel Kayano 31 is often considered the better choice. It features a 4D Guidance System that helps keep your foot aligned and offers great support for overpronators.
The GT 2000 13 also provides stability, but it’s designed to be more versatile and may not offer as much support as the Kayano. So, for maximum stability, the Kayano 31 is the winner!
Are these shoes good for long-distance running?
Yes, both shoes are suitable for long-distance running! The Gel Kayano 31 is especially praised for its comfort and cushioning, making it great for marathon training.
The GT 2000 13 is also a solid option for long runs, but it’s a bit lighter, which can be nice if you want to pick up the pace. So, if you’re planning a long run, you can’t go wrong with either shoe!
How do the fit and sizing compare?
The Gel Kayano 31 tends to have a roomier fit, especially in the toe box, which many runners find comfortable. It’s recommended to stick with your usual size. The GT 2000 13, while also true to size, may feel a bit narrower, so if you have wider feet, you might want to try it on before buying. Overall, both shoes have a good fit, but the Kayano offers a bit more space.
What is the price difference between the two models?
The Gel Kayano 31 is priced at around $160, while the GT 2000 13 is usually a bit cheaper, typically around $140.
The price can vary based on sales and where you buy them, so it’s a good idea to shop around. If you’re looking for a high-quality stability shoe, both options are worth the investment!